Comments on: Episode 16 http://2d6feet.com/episode-16 2d6 Feet in a Random Direction is a podcast about games - roleplaying, miniatures, and board games - and related topics like culture and community. Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:43:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Dustin Cooper http://2d6feet.com/episode-16/comment-page-1#comment-2587 Dustin Cooper Tue, 08 May 2007 16:35:09 +0000 http://www.2d6feet.com/?p=31#comment-2587 That was a great show!!! The talk about what WotC could do about D&D 4.0 was very interesting. If I could have a say about what they should do, I would suggest that they dump all of their stuff and support Warhammer FRP! ;-) I have been telling my friend to play the latest Warhammer because of his disappointment with D&D. I kept telling this is what D&D should of been like. It finally took me to buy him the main rule book for his birthday and now he is a believer. They really did a good job with that game when they revised it. Unlike D&D, when they suggest rule alternatives (like with encumberance or hit locations) you really feel like it is okay to not use the main rules (unlike 3.5 which says "you do not have to use these rules, but after all, we did dedicated 40 pages to this subjec"t). Thanks again! Dustin That was a great show!!! The talk about what WotC could do about D&D 4.0 was very interesting. If I could have a say about what they should do, I would suggest that they dump all of their stuff and support Warhammer FRP! ;-)

I have been telling my friend to play the latest Warhammer because of his disappointment with D&D. I kept telling this is what D&D should of been like. It finally took me to buy him the main rule book for his birthday and now he is a believer. They really did a good job with that game when they revised it. Unlike D&D, when they suggest rule alternatives (like with encumberance or hit locations) you really feel like it is okay to not use the main rules (unlike 3.5 which says “you do not have to use these rules, but after all, we did dedicated 40 pages to this subjec”t).

Thanks again!

Dustin

]]>